| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Justin Martin
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 Posts: 328
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 8:29 am Post subject: Nissan Delta Wing your thoughts? |
|
|
Personally as innovative as it may be I feel the the advantages lost in downforce adjustment, suspension, and front tire contact patch.... Too many compromises IMO.
What are your thoughts?
Last edited by Justin Martin on Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:45 am, edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Zambos
Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 540 Location: United States, Illinois, near Chicago
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I heartily and respectfully disagree. I would absolutely love to race this thing.
This isn't a typically car that, because of the limits of mechanical grip due to high vehicle weight, must rely heavily (no pun intended) upon downforce to get it through the turns. As it is so light, the only downforce requirements are to keep the vehicle vertically stable, to counter the thing from becoming too light from lift at high speed. You then really don't have to worry about generating more downforce for a specific application and therefore don't need to worry about adjusting it to a significant degree.
Contact patch is relative. If your grip is ample, you'd say that the contact patch is appropriate, wouldn't you? Well, the Delta Wing doesn't lack front grip. So, even though the front tires look like they could go on my bicycle, they get the job done.
I can't speak to the suspension. I race a kart, after all.
Listen, I thought the thing was ridiculous at first and even as late as last February when the mock-up was at the Chicago Auto Show. It's proven me wrong, and it was as fast as an LMP2 with the same motor that powers a Nissan Juke (btw, Nissan, not Mazda), and Bowlby says that there's a lot left to develop. To boot, it was designed in the States (admittedly by an Englishman), developed it the States and built in the States.
I love it and want one. I think it even might fit in my trailer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TJ Koyen
Joined: 03 Oct 2004 Posts: 1414 Location: United States, Wisconsin, Sun Prairie
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I also have grown to love it. I hated it as a concept for the new IndyCar, but as a prototype road racer, it's awesome. And it's proven to be pretty damn quick. _________________ T.J. Koyen
OKTANE VISUAL - Custom Helmet Paint & Graphic Design
www.oktanevisual.com
www.facebook.com/oktanevisual
--------------------------
DB Motorsports
Exprit/Leopard |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Hurst
Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 569 Location: United States, California,
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Delta Wing really caught my eye when I first saw it. I think it's in line with an alternative way of thinking that doesn't get put into practice as much as it should be due to regulations and it's a shame.
Reminds me of some of Luigi Colani's designs if anyone is unfamiliar with him if you read his books you will look at the best looking modern race cars and think they look boring. Some of this work:
30% better fuel consumption without even touching the motor.
Ferrari told him he didn't know how to build cars so he took an F50 I think that was and redesigned it. I think to date it is actually the highest top speed Ferrari in the world.
[img]http://thinng.com/system/images/3458/large/luigi-colani-aerodynamic-race-cars3.png?1317806401[/img]
Shooting for 300mph with this car in the future according to Colani.
He has a lot of other cars and a great book of auto / industrial design. When I saw the Delta it reminded me of a Colani car for Le Mans. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Martin
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 Posts: 328
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Guys, I guess I didn't quite make my opinion clear. It's not so much the aerodynamic properties I am against, nor am I against the lighter weight or smaller engine. I am against the design of the front end.
From an aeronautical engineering standpoint one can achieve the same aerodynamic advantages without sacrificing such things like a wider front end.(I am in my Sr year of aerospace engineering, and I am not blowing hot air....)
I have countless hours toying with aerodynamic properties and there is no advantage in that front end over a wider conventional front end. You can achieve the same drag coefficient with many different shapes. Frontal surface area, or pressure has less to do with aerodynamic force than the air you leave behind you.
I am all for a lighter less powerful, more aerodynamic car. However I believe it can be achieved with a conventional much wider front end.
After all, aren't you guys of all people aware of how front end adjustments can effect a car/kart? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeff grose
Joined: 11 Dec 2008 Posts: 1249 Location: United States, Florida, cocoa
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so much for the D-Wing, crashed out @ Petit Lemans today _________________ jlgracing
#31 Gillard/PDBAmerica
IAME Leopards by P1 Engines
Tag Sr./FKCS/WKA
Driver: Jesse Grose
Remember: "No matter where you go,there you are" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Hurst
Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 569 Location: United States, California,
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Justin Martin wrote: | Guys, I guess I didn't quite make my opinion clear. It's not so much the aerodynamic properties I am against, nor am I against the lighter weight or smaller engine. I am against the design of the front end.
From an aeronautical engineering standpoint one can achieve the same aerodynamic advantages without sacrificing such things like a wider front end.(I am in my Sr year of aerospace engineering, and I am not blowing hot air....)
I have countless hours toying with aerodynamic properties and there is no advantage in that front end over a wider conventional front end. You can achieve the same drag coefficient with many different shapes. Frontal surface area, or pressure has less to do with aerodynamic force than the air you leave behind you.
I am all for a lighter less powerful, more aerodynamic car. However I believe it can be achieved with a conventional much wider front end.
After all, aren't you guys of all people aware of how front end adjustments can effect a car/kart? |
Thats an interesting observation. Would be interesting to ask one of your teachers that question. I'd be really interested to see what someone with a Ph.D or a lot of experience in the subject matter would say.
Maybe they made the front end smaller to help with maneuvering around the field or track? I don't think they would do it unless there was a reason behind it.
Can anyone offer some insight? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Zambos
Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 540 Location: United States, Illinois, near Chicago
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Justin Martin wrote: | | After all, aren't you guys of all people aware of how front end adjustments can effect a car/kart? |
I'm sure there's one or two of us around here that might have an idea. Remember, though, there are a lot of reasons for why the front end of a kart has to be as wide as it is that may not pertain to a car, especially if the position and width from vehicle centerline are not determined by the technical regulations, as a car doesn't have that pesky solid rear axle that we do. As long as your center of gravity's height isn't overpowering the narrow track, which is why many cars have the front track width they do, why make it wider than it has to be?
You can then start with a clean canvas, and if your design doesn't require a more tradition front track width, then why do it? Justin, perhaps you can steer my thoughts as my background doesn't include your education, but I would think that if you can get away with the narrow front end, the vehicle can potentially have lower drag at the font, allowing the opportunity to find a gentler path for the air to flow around the vehicle similar to how the F-16 jet widens after the cockpit section.
Ultimately, is it just the aesthetics that you don't like, Justin? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Zambos
Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 540 Location: United States, Illinois, near Chicago
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeff grose
Joined: 11 Dec 2008 Posts: 1249 Location: United States, Florida, cocoa
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
quite a discussion of who was at fault on the wreck  _________________ jlgracing
#31 Gillard/PDBAmerica
IAME Leopards by P1 Engines
Tag Sr./FKCS/WKA
Driver: Jesse Grose
Remember: "No matter where you go,there you are" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Livengood
Joined: 24 Jul 2001 Posts: 2432 Location: United States, Pennsylvania, Da Burgh
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's an interesting experiment that's for sure. It has done a nice job of presenting some design ideas and it has even won over some praise, probably more so than it deserves in some cases but less in other areas.
The ACO screwed them when they didn't let them run their differential, otherwise it could have been cooler yet.
Bottom line is that it is a cool idea, it will inspire children to dream about racecars again, and it might even provide good science for future ideas. It however is not the answer for the racecar of tomorrow. The law of physics haven't changed. _________________ http://www.Chrislivengood.net
http://www.Work-Racing.com
http://www.OurZeal.com
http://www.Karting101.com
"Auto racing, helping white guys get laid since 1887!!!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Hurst
Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 569 Location: United States, California,
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not sure if any of you guys have seen this article, but I'm sure it will be interesting to some:
What Can-Am would be today if there were no restrictions....
http://www.caranddriver.com/features/what-can-am-could-have-been
Even if the Delta Wing crashes and burns (metaphorically of course) at least they are out doing something different and trying new things. If I turn 80 some day and racing cars still look the same I'll be severely disappointed.
On the whole though when you look at the shapes of automobile in terms of overall shape they really haven't been altered much in the last 60 years. What surprises me most with the Delta Wing is that given they are going for efficiency and light weight over brute force and horsepower they have chose to keep it an open cockpit style race car.
You would think they would enclose it for aero purposes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scott Heavin
Joined: 18 Oct 2006 Posts: 1766 Location: United States, Indiana, New Castle
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I took this at the Ganassi shop a few months ago...
 _________________ Spec TaG Masters @ NCMP / #23 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gregory Dzielinski
Joined: 12 Oct 2005 Posts: 221 Location: United States, New Jersey, Ramsey
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Delta Wing crashed heavly yesterday at RA _________________ The wheel is turning and you can't slow down,
You can't let go and you can't hold on,
You can't go back and you can't stand still,
If the thunder don't get you then the lightning will. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Hurst
Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 569 Location: United States, California,
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Scott Heavin wrote: | I took this at the Ganassi shop a few months ago...
 |
That thing looks amazing in silver and it really is something else to look at. Reminds me of an SR-71 in that photo. Nice! I don't care what anyone says I still think this car is really unique and I would love to drive one. Would anyone pass that opportunity up ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|