| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
marc walsh
Joined: 11 May 2011 Posts: 130
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:30 pm Post subject: 50 or 40mm axel??? |
|
|
| Guys Ive got a chance to pick up on a complete bolt up 50 mm axle assy for a good price however not sure it will even make a difference from my 40 mm on my Haase Skorpion. Opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oscar Aguilera
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 Posts: 1614
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok ill give a shot to see if i can help you.
first it depends on what class and what tire you are running. the advantage of the 50mm is that it allows you to run a softer axle than with the 40mm. and if the class you run with the tires is calling for a soft set up....usually the softer 40mm stuff bends too easily.
so if you in your tuning wisdom believe you need a softer axle and you are down the bottom of the soft axles in you 40mm set,,,,then yes the 50mm will give you that extra looseness you are needing if you are still bound up with the soft 40mm stuff.
so if you are running a medium to hard set up with your 40mm and dont plan to go to another class or stickier tire......the 50mm will probably do nothing for you....other than resale value? if it is that good of a deal
hope this helps
just my opinion |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Len Cockman
Joined: 17 Jun 2010 Posts: 44 Location: United States, Indiana, Granger
|
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:06 pm Post subject: 40 vs. 50 mm. axle |
|
|
At the Daytona ManCup I did a grid walk before both Supercan finals. We were one of 3 teams in a field of 22 that had a 40mm. axle. At the Pittsburgh International race we had a 50 just like most everyone else. Gotta do what the fast guys are doing. _________________ The challenge of the "thrash" between runs makes it all worth while. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TJ Koyen
Joined: 03 Oct 2004 Posts: 1415
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
50mm always felt more stable to me compared to the 40, and seems to give you a little bit greater adjustability. Easier to sell too. However, it's expensive to swap out all the rear end parts for 50mm stuff. But if you can get it cheap, might as well. _________________ T.J. Koyen
OKTANE VISUAL - Custom Helmet Paint & Graphic Design
www.oktanevisual.com
www.facebook.com/oktanevisual
--------------------------
DB Motorsports
Exprit/Leopard |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Schmidt
Joined: 05 Jul 2010 Posts: 242 Location: United States, Kansas, Kansas City
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So, if bigger is better, then how soon till the Europeans start making 60mm axles for us to use? _________________ Bill Schmidt
'95 Trackmagic 125 shifter (Kawi)
'88 Red Devil F500 4-link rear (Rotax) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joseph hollinger
Joined: 12 Sep 2002 Posts: 9479 Location: United States, California, san francisco
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bill Schmidt wrote: | | So, if bigger is better, then how soon till the Europeans start making 60mm axles for us to use? |
It might not be possible. Despite what people seem to believe, every 50 mm axle is stiffer than any 40 mm axle. That's just physics. 60's would be stiffer too and it might not work in practice.
In reality, the whole 50mm thing was a gimmick to sell karts in the first place. We all fell for it so hats off to those clever kart manufacturers. _________________ A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. -- Winston Churchill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan Schultz
Joined: 14 Oct 2001 Posts: 162 Location: United States, Illinois, Bolingbrook
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| joseph hollinger wrote: | | Bill Schmidt wrote: | | So, if bigger is better, then how soon till the Europeans start making 60mm axles for us to use? |
It might not be possible. Despite what people seem to believe, every 50 mm axle is stiffer than any 40 mm axle. That's just physics. 60's would be stiffer too and it might not work in practice.
In reality, the whole 50mm thing was a gimmick to sell karts in the first place. We all fell for it so hats off to those clever kart manufacturers. |
Have you run the numbers on that. If the 50 is thinner wall section, it is possible for it to more flexible than a thicker wall 40mm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joseph hollinger
Joined: 12 Sep 2002 Posts: 9479 Location: United States, California, san francisco
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dan Schultz wrote: | | joseph hollinger wrote: | | Bill Schmidt wrote: | | So, if bigger is better, then how soon till the Europeans start making 60mm axles for us to use? |
It might not be possible. Despite what people seem to believe, every 50 mm axle is stiffer than any 40 mm axle. That's just physics. 60's would be stiffer too and it might not work in practice.
In reality, the whole 50mm thing was a gimmick to sell karts in the first place. We all fell for it so hats off to those clever kart manufacturers. |
Have you run the numbers on that. If the 50 is thinner wall section, it is possible for it to more flexible than a thicker wall 40mm. |
It's been a while Dan, but from memory that's not correct. _________________ A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. -- Winston Churchill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan Schultz
Joined: 14 Oct 2001 Posts: 162 Location: United States, Illinois, Bolingbrook
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You think it's not possible for a 40 mm to be stiffer than a 50? Within the thicknesses used for karts, it might be true, but to make a blanket statement that any 50 is stiffer than a 40 is ridiculous. Try making a 50 the thickness of an aluminum can compared to a solid 40 mm and let me know what has higher stiffness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Reinhardt
Joined: 29 Aug 2002 Posts: 2931 Location: United States, New York, Ossining
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bill Schmidt wrote: | | So, if bigger is better, then how soon till the Europeans start making 60mm axles for us to use? |
I'm sure there's a few engineering reasons, but the more basic answer is because the FIA/CIK won't allow anything bigger than 50mm.
The rear shaft (axle) must have a maximum external
diameter of 50 mm and a minimum wall thickness of 1.9
mm at all points.
CR _________________ East Coast Super Kart Series
"This is how we roll!"
www.eastcoastsuperkart.webs.com
CR2 Motorsports
"Home of Cobalt Superkarts"
www.CR2MotorSports.webs.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joseph hollinger
Joined: 12 Sep 2002 Posts: 9479 Location: United States, California, san francisco
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dan Schultz wrote: | | You think it's not possible for a 40 mm to be stiffer than a 50? Within the thicknesses used for karts, it might be true, but to make a blanket statement that any 50 is stiffer than a 40 is ridiculous. Try making a 50 the thickness of an aluminum can compared to a solid 40 mm and let me know what has higher stiffness. |
Well, you couldn't really buy an axle with that sort of wall thickness, now could you?
If you google around a bit, you'll discover that the stiffness of a tube is proportional to Pi/64 * (D^4 - d^4). I'm not a structural engineer and I'll admit up front that 64 might really be 32 but for our purposes, that's irrelevant.
If you assume that you have a 50mm axle with a 2mm wall thickness and your trying to find an equivalently stiff 40, you get something like this:
Pi/64 * (50^4 - 46^4) = Pi/64 (40^4 - d^4)
if you solve for d, you get
d^4 = -(50^4 - 46^4 - 40^4)
plug that into your calculator and you find that d comes out to be 29.8mm.
In other words, to make a 40 as stiff as a 50, the 40 would have to have a 5.1mm wall thickness.
Maybe someone sells that sort of thing but I've never seen it. And I've certainly never seen anyone using something like that on a kart. _________________ A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. -- Winston Churchill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oscar Aguilera
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 Posts: 1614
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its a love hate relationship i have with engineers? i almost became one and i believe that this trait helps me to analyze things better sometimes....but sometimes you just have to cough up the cash and do it yourself?
so when they say it takes money to win....and how fast do you want to go? this is where that applies.
after all the debate on here on whatever subject....you can only be sure by trying it,,,,taking good notes....analyze the conditions and take note of that as well....get a good record of your lap times. note the difference of when your lap times went faster or slower.....go make changes and do the above again....
then take all that you have for data...extra parts....tuning parts....and go to a new track and see if you learned anything.
how will you know? check out your stop watch...and if you have the $$$ for a mychron....you can use that too.
i dont care to debate the properties of the metal or why a crg/birel axle costs so much..
but In my experience. when i ran a 40mm and we ran relatively hard tires by most standards....i had to use the crg 40mm met. it was the correct axle that netted me the best lap times.....BUT! it was like butter. if i tapped a curb, it would bend on impact. if i got over another kart and landed hard on it....it was bent for sure. we all know this happens no matter how good a driver you are.
when the 50mm stuff came out...the crg t4 2mm was rated with the same stiffness as the MET 40.
guess what? it was more durable! when i hit a curb it didnt bend! and when the met 40 was not soft enough for what i needed....i could not even imagine going to the next softer for my weight. they did exist but only the jrs could use them.
where in the 50mm set up....there are 4 axles softer that i have used with confidence. the S20 is an axle i use on occasion and it is pretty durable. but i do have to be careful...i have bent one before.
the other side is...with the 40mm stuff...for my weight...i have seen them give way and bend/break at the key way when they have a cut for 100cc keyway and a shifter key way. they will wear out and just snap one day when they get too old.
seen it happen...had it happen.
i never had that happen with the range of axles i use in the 50mm stuff.
i know kart companies do things to say they are "new" when most of the changes they make have been done before to the chassis. they go back to what has worked in the past with an angle on one bar or the thickness of the other.....but none of the chassis manuf have gone back to 40mm. they made them for a reason....and if what they do doesnt work or can be done differently....they will go back to that the following homologation and call it the "new" chassis.
if you have been around long enough....that is what has happened from my view point.
so let me guess....anyone on here talking about the 40 being so good....either is selling one? uses it in the junior classes and hasnt see the benefit for the sr classes....or is on a 50 and isnt fast enough to know the difference? or is on the 50 and never had a 40? or has gone the same lap times on a 40 and a 50...like i did...and hasnt needed to use the next softer 40?
let me know if i am missing a category?
im not dogging the 40 but there is a place and time for that axle set up. i give my honest opinion and try to help on here. i dont think anyone on here is the end all be all to what to do on chassis set ups...and the ones that i know are...dont give there advice on here for free because they make a living at it. sometimes you do have to see that all the front runners are using X items...parts...chassis...but that is all you can see. you cant see front end set ups as easily,,,axle grades...seat positions...tire pressure....or jetting. when you go to a BIG race...it is kinda cool to see 10 different chassis in the top ten spots...they are all well tuned and up front with tenths of a second or less separating them.
sometimes the debate on here is fun? or sometimes it can get hostile? i had some fun with the gearing debate....but that hasnt cost anyone anything....
when some of these debates cost $$$$...i tend to joke around a little less and give you my experience.
when in doubt? go test.
and signing out "just my opinion" is my way of saying...this is what i have done....go figure it out for yourself....use what i put on here if you want.
is "adios" more appropriate? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Burris
Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 574 Location: United States, California, Huntington Beach
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Joe, I agree with you about the gimmick aspect. The sad part is the Italian chassis manufacturers (aka CIK) have been gaming the system for years and driven up chassis prices to stupid levels. Even if they have a diameter limit now the constant changes over the years has added to the cost and kept a lot of people the sport was intended for away. Now they are playing the game with front spindles and $1,000 a set wheels! Our sanctioning bodies should have never allowed this to happen but the "we should be like the rest of the world" lobby and importers won out.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joseph hollinger
Joined: 12 Sep 2002 Posts: 9479 Location: United States, California, san francisco
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with all of that. _________________ A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. -- Winston Churchill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Livengood
Joined: 24 Jul 2001 Posts: 2432 Location: United States, Pennsylvania, Da Burgh
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|