EKN Platinum Forum - Russell
MIR Racewear - LB
HOME - NEWS - FEATURES - DRIVERS - PR WIRE - FORUMS - MULTIMEDIA - PHOTOS - SCHEDULES - RESULTS - LINKS - INTERNATIONAL NEWS - NEW TO KARTING - CONTACT

Brett King Design


Buddy Rice Karting - DB


Pure Karting - DB


Extreme Karting


Fastech Racing


OTP - Button


Huddy Motorsports

SCCA Enterprises - FB
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Login to check your private messagesLogin to check your private messages   LoginLogin 
Anyone got some KZ\ICC Dyno Charts?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    eKartingNews.com Forum Index -> Shifter Karts
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
al nunley



Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 3027

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just amazes me how few understand the torque/HP connection.
You get no HP from the engine to the rear axle. You only get torque. You then calculate the HP at the rear axle. The more torque, (the work) the more HP you can calculate. I don’t understand why nobody understands this.
Torque is what does the wrok, not the HP, the HP is a calcultion.
Look at it this way, the more torque you get to the rear axle, the more HP you can calculate at the rear axle. Seems beyond simple to me.
Look it up In any book you can, Or go to wikipedia
_________________
If the data does not support the theory, get a new theory. (Al Nunley)
All else being equal; Compression is the Holy Grail.
45 years, in and around karting
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tim Salvino



Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Posts: 257

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Torque is also a calculation.

Distance x Force.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Brian Degulis



Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 412
Location: United States, Florida,

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

al nunley wrote:
I just amazes me how few understand the torque/HP connection.
You get no HP from the engine to the rear axle. You only get torque. You then calculate the HP at the rear axle. The more torque, (the work) the more HP you can calculate. I don’t understand why nobody understands this.
Torque is what does the wrok, not the HP, the HP is a calcultion.
Look at it this way, the more torque you get to the rear axle, the more HP you can calculate at the rear axle. Seems beyond simple to me.
Look it up In any book you can, Or go to wikipedia


This is what I love about physics there is no argument. We could argue all day about who should be president or wether or not global warming is reall but with physics as expressed earlier it is the law.

If you had only torqe to the rear axle your vehicle couldn't move an inch. You must have some torque and some RPM. With those you can calculate HP a total measurement of available power which is what drives everything.

It's much like electricity. You can have a million volts and no power or you could have a million amps and still no power. You must have some voltage and some amperage to have power. With that you can calculate Watts a total measurment of available power.

Watts is to electricity what HP is to mechanical power. You must have both ingredients to have power which is then expressed as Watts for electricity and HP for mechanical power.

Brian
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Virgil Tripp



Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 7
Location: United States, Texas, Bastrop

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Torque and RPM are measured. HP is calculated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Goebel



Joined: 28 Jul 2001
Posts: 5763
Location: United States, California, Winnetka

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Virgil Tripp wrote:
Torque and RPM are measured. HP is calculated.


Wrong!!!

You can measure force at a distance then calculate torque Laughing Laughing Laughing


Mike G.
_________________
Closet KZ Lover!!!
mfg Technology Centre
So Cal’s #1 Non Profit Engine Builder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Goebel



Joined: 28 Jul 2001
Posts: 5763
Location: United States, California, Winnetka

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are a lot of things that are calculated

Lets see

Speed. But who cares about that.
Power. But who cares about that.
bfsc. But who cares about that.
BMEP. But who cares about that.
lateral G. But who cares about that.
Braking G. But who cares about that.
Acceleration G. But who cares about that.
Jerk. Yes it's real and used in camshaft design

Torque is nothing without power. Ever seen an 18 wheeler out accelerate a 3 cyl car. Why??? because it has tons of torque and very low power.


Mike G.
_________________
Closet KZ Lover!!!
mfg Technology Centre
So Cal’s #1 Non Profit Engine Builder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Virgil Tripp



Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 7
Location: United States, Texas, Bastrop

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Point taken. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Brian Degulis



Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 412
Location: United States, Florida,

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can calculate torque if you know HP and RPM. The point is that HP is what we use to determine available over all power. Then you can gear to create the precentage of RPM and torque to do whatever job you need to do within the HP limitations but the power you get from that will be the same as what you started with minus transmission loses and will still be expressed in HP.



Brian
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Goebel



Joined: 28 Jul 2001
Posts: 5763
Location: United States, California, Winnetka

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thats the great thing about Power. It doesn't matter where you want to calculate it, it's the same every where. Unlike crappy old Torque that changes from one place to another. Laughing


Mike G.
_________________
Closet KZ Lover!!!
mfg Technology Centre
So Cal’s #1 Non Profit Engine Builder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Joe Ricard



Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 864
Location: United States, Mississippi,

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now that there are 3 pages of KZ loving.

What is the general consensus on HP numbers for a new KZ motor.
_________________
Arrow AX-8/ Rotax Sr.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Goebel



Joined: 28 Jul 2001
Posts: 5763
Location: United States, California, Winnetka

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know but I bet it's huge!! Laughing


Mike G.
_________________
Closet KZ Lover!!!
mfg Technology Centre
So Cal’s #1 Non Profit Engine Builder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tim Salvino



Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Posts: 257

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joe Ricard wrote:
Now that there are 3 pages of KZ loving.

What is the general consensus on HP numbers for a new KZ motor.


What numbers are you looking for???

Every dyno is going to show a different #. The people who sell and rebuild them will have a dyno that shows higher #'s. It makes business sense, because there are waayyyy too many people who just look at the peak hp # and make their buying decision based purely on that.

A new KZ should make somewhere in the high-30's to low 40's. And that's a real world guesstimate. Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike Goebel



Joined: 28 Jul 2001
Posts: 5763
Location: United States, California, Winnetka

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Brian Degulis wrote:
On the other hand is it really possible to apply this in reall world driving? You'd have to be pretty focused on the tach.


Brian


Yes!! The best way to do this is to use your data acquisition system and look to see what RPM you are shifting and then use that to get a feel of what you need to change to get to the correct shift points. Best would be to do a bunch of straight line acceleration tests, use 2 beacons, and try different shift points to see if there is any difference. No one will do this because its too easy. I never did it either Laughing


Mike G.
_________________
Closet KZ Lover!!!
mfg Technology Centre
So Cal’s #1 Non Profit Engine Builder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Brian Degulis



Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 412
Location: United States, Florida,

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 9:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes trying to change the trend makes good sense.



Brian
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Erik Maxfield



Joined: 16 May 2004
Posts: 1068
Location: United States, California, Vacaville

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

somebody could take the HP or torque curve, figure out the RPM drop for each gear change, and then integrate (or crunch numbers in Excel) to figure out how to maximize the amount of HP under the curve so as to determine shift points.....

Off topic but pertinent to the discussion.... and hinted at by Mr. Schumachers closest buddy.
_________________
Erik
The early bird gets the worm.....
The second mouse gets the cheese....

Stock CR125.
Chassis-FrankenKART
Intrepid/ITAL combination
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    eKartingNews.com Forum Index -> Shifter Karts All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Go Top
Copyright © 2002 - 2013 Ekartingnews.com. All Rights Reserved.       Maintained by Holbi LLP
DB time: 0.189 (46.46%), total time:0.406782, queries:38