| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Paul Makarucha
Joined: 11 Jun 2002 Posts: 891 Location: United States, New Jersey,
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
If not on the rotor than the apex seals go on the wall/liner or on hmm, i guess we'll call them the ports. The rotor in such a case is typically not a triangle but more of a "8" shape.
In this case there are two versions of this rotary which do not require apex seals on the rotor itself.
I haven't seen an Aixro myself yet. I've heard one on track but was too busy to go check it out. _________________ CKR/KZ
CRG/ICA
http://WWW.ACTIONKARTRACING.COM/
http://neshifterkartseries.com/
http://Jaymotorsports.com
Do you have any special rituals when the helmet is concerned like many have? - "I wipe it so that I can see better." - Kimi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Hurst
Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 572 Location: United States, California,
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Paul Makarucha wrote: | If not on the rotor than the apex seals go on the wall/liner or on hmm, i guess we'll call them the ports. The rotor in such a case is typically not a triangle but more of a "8" shape.
In this case there are two versions of this rotary which do not require apex seals on the rotor itself.
I haven't seen an Aixro myself yet. I've heard one on track but was too busy to go check it out. |
I've never heard of that Paul, thanks. Seems plausible though I've never seen a rotary engine like that before.
Can anyone confirm or deny the rebuild time on these being 100 + hours? I spoke to someone who owned one a year or so ago and he was claiming 298 hours without a rebuild yet.
Should be noted however that he said the motor was operating 1500-2000rpm under what Aixro claimed was safe. Any truth to this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul Makarucha
Joined: 11 Jun 2002 Posts: 891 Location: United States, New Jersey,
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brian G. Wilson
Joined: 18 Sep 2007 Posts: 680 Location: United States, Florida,
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Higher rpm's will kill this engine, they have a rev limiter but suggest you never hit the limiter. If you keep it just below the limiter, they suggest a rebuild every 100 hours to replace the ceramic apex seals and the main bearing at 300 hours. They warn if you disable the rev limiter or go above the recommended max rpm's, the engine will produce flying shrapnel.
As far as 298 hours between a rebuild, I guess if the engine was driven easy and well below max rpm's all the time, it would be possible, but not ideal. _________________ KEEP WORKING....millions of people on welfare depend on you !! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Hurst
Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 572 Location: United States, California,
|
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paul- Thanks for the link to the article. I'm reading it now, some really interesting engines.
Brian- That is actually pretty incredible and if you think about it the initial hit of $6000 for an aixro would easily make itself up when you think about the rebuild costs on some of the higher end shifter / TaG motors if you were to drive those 300 hours.
Other than the up front cost of the motor I don't see why this hasn't caught on in the US. They seem like a great way to go fast without having to do the maintenance. I've heard they generate a TON of heat, but it's not as if thats the be all end all of why these haven't caught on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brian Degulis
Joined: 13 Aug 2012 Posts: 454 Location: United States, Florida,
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Part of the problem might be that from a cost perspective they are often compared to a TAG engine package I guess because they're single speed and self starting. They should be compared to the cost of a shifter.
Brian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Martin
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 Posts: 331
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Exactly! an ICC is $5,500! There are many people that seem to be jut fine buying an ICC and then paying for rebuild costs constantly |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Benn Herr
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 Posts: 1584
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
The problem is three parts.
First, the power band is "wrong" for karting. It has a reasonable bottom end, good mid-range, strong peak power, and nothing past that. You can get away with that on an oval if you pay attention to your gearing. They really don’t like to be over revved. Damage comes quickly (and expensively) if you do that. Some of the UAS guys use them with great success. The big bore 450 single four strokes have the same issue.
Second, they don’t like long runs at full power. That limits their use on the bigger Road Race tracks. Gear the kart so you don’t over-rev and you’ll be on the clutch for a long time. If you can find a clutch that will deal with that kind of abuse. At least the big four strokes come with a gearbox if you’re going to do that.
Third, they make a lot of heat. As in burning through the standard mufflers. And a muffler you will need. Open pipe rotaries are ear piercingly loud.
Then there is the usual marketing hype that is used to sell so many new things to karters. They used it on all the Rotax, TAG, Clone, ICC/KZ, etc.. engines. It lasts forever! Hundreds of hours between rebuilds! It will always have competitive power! Yeh, right. It’s an engine and you’re going to race it. That means you will use it as hard as you can. And that means it will break and somebody (you) will have to pay to fix it.
I suppose you could all agree to run a conservative gear and don’t mess with the tuning. But that’s not really racing is it? _________________ Benn Herr
Come see our Superkart Build Off @
http://www.lostenduros.com/?page_id=1534
beherr3@cox.net
http://www.southwestkarters.com/
http://www.lostenduros.com/
Kart Design
Chandler, Az. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Justin Martin
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 Posts: 331
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Benn, while I agree with what you are saying on some of your points, if you run an ICC past its rev limiter to say 19k or 20K you will surely blow it up too. So how is that even close to a reasonable answer? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Benn Herr
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 Posts: 1584
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Justin, While I don't know if an ICC will even go that high, you can spin it well past it's power peak and not experience rapid engine destruction. At that time you pull the lever and catch another gear. The Italians are very good at making engines that can do that.
The big four strokes and the rotary don't tolerate the same kind of abuse. Float the valves a little bit once in a while and it's no big deal. Do it for the last couple of seconds of the straight every lap at your local Sprint track and be ready for a parts bill. Same goes for the rotary.
There is also the problem of having too much power. You can easily fry the tires coming off a corner and that can be a little overwhelming for the non-expert(what a problem to have!).
I like the way it fits on karts and the amount of power it makes for how hard it's stressed. But that's not how we treat kart engines. We always ask for everything engine will give us, and that's the weak point in the system. It's too easy to go from running fast and fine to hard and hurting it. _________________ Benn Herr
Come see our Superkart Build Off @
http://www.lostenduros.com/?page_id=1534
beherr3@cox.net
http://www.southwestkarters.com/
http://www.lostenduros.com/
Kart Design
Chandler, Az. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TJ Koyen
Joined: 03 Oct 2004 Posts: 1458
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
If we were running this engine at a national level, we would rev it as high as we needed to go fastest. Benn is right, any engine that is used in a serious racing format will be abused, and all the figures of "100 hours between rebuilds" will come tumbling down. Even if it doesn't need rebuilding, there are people who will spend money to rebuild it, just to make sure it's completely fresh every time they go out.
That's why these karts work so well for trackday type events, and part of the reason it isn't being raced competitively. _________________ T.J. Koyen
OKTANE VISUAL - Custom Helmet Paint & Graphic Design
www.oktanevisual.com
www.facebook.com/oktanevisual
--------------------------
DB Motorsports
Exprit/Leopard |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Hurst
Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 572 Location: United States, California,
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Benn Herr wrote: | The problem is three parts.
First, the power band is "wrong" for karting. It has a reasonable bottom end, good mid-range, strong peak power, and nothing past that.
I suppose you could all agree to run a conservative gear and don’t mess with the tuning. But that’s not really racing is it? |
Here is Renntech's dyno sheet of the XR50
30 ft lbs from 4000-8000rpm is "reasonable" ? Personally I think that is a little more than reasonable.
I was also unaware there was some portion of an engines power band beyond bottom end, mid range and top end. What did you mean by that comment?
As far as "not really racing" is concerned:
Have you heard of spec racing? This could be a great spec class where you put an emphasis on driver and chassis tuning rather than motor tuning. I see what you're saying, but lets be honest...if someone is a 7/10 driver but can make more power than a guy who is a 10/10 driver the chances he can make up ground are much higher than if everything is equal.
Is real racing about winning because of your machine or because you're a better driver? The flip side of your comment in my mind is actually less of real racing as it puts more emphasis on the machine than the driver.
Personally I think the most entertaining races to watch are spec races because you see the psychology of race tactics unfold. Watching the Australian V8 touring cars last weekend or even Spec Miata IMO is much more entertaining than almost any F1 race I can recall in the last 5 years.
If the XR50 was a spec series it would have my vote 100% |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joseph hollinger
Joined: 12 Sep 2002 Posts: 9536 Location: United States, California, san francisco
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TJ Koyen wrote: | | Even if it doesn't need rebuilding, there are people who will spend money to rebuild it, just to make sure it's completely fresh every time they go out. |
That's not the same as say that there is an advantage to doing that. Mazda has a pretty amazing record in competition, facing pretty much the same challenges you guys seem to think are insurmountable in the karting context and there's nothing to suggest that racing those rotaries was any more expensive that racing anything else. _________________ A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on. -- Winston Churchill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brian Degulis
Joined: 13 Aug 2012 Posts: 454 Location: United States, Florida,
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Benn Herr wrote: | The problem is three parts.
First, the power band is "wrong" for karting. It has a reasonable bottom end, good mid-range, strong peak power, and nothing past that. You can get away with that on an oval if you pay attention to your gearing. They really don’t like to be over revved. Damage comes quickly (and expensively) if you do that. Some of the UAS guys use them with great success. The big bore 450 single four strokes have the same issue.
Second, they don’t like long runs at full power. That limits their use on the bigger Road Race tracks. Gear the kart so you don’t over-rev and you’ll be on the clutch for a long time. If you can find a clutch that will deal with that kind of abuse. At least the big four strokes come with a gearbox if you’re going to do that.
Third, they make a lot of heat. As in burning through the standard mufflers. And a muffler you will need. Open pipe rotaries are ear piercingly loud.
Then there is the usual marketing hype that is used to sell so many new things to karters. They used it on all the Rotax, TAG, Clone, ICC/KZ, etc.. engines. It lasts forever! Hundreds of hours between rebuilds! It will always have competitive power! Yeh, right. It’s an engine and you’re going to race it. That means you will use it as hard as you can. And that means it will break and somebody (you) will have to pay to fix it.
I suppose you could all agree to run a conservative gear and don’t mess with the tuning. But that’s not really racing is it? |
Your right about them not liking long runs at full power but not for the reasons you stated. These engines have a partial by pass which lowers the amount of fuel iol mixture going to the crank case at full power so no more than 10 seconds at full power.
You always have to temper the manufacturer claims of time between rebuilds but like Rotax they may not live up to the claims but they do go a whole lot longer than other engines of similiar power and the rebuild is simpler and less expensive.
The other stuff you mention has already been proven wrong as these engines are a popular class in Europe.
Some people look at something diffrent and ask why? Others look at the same thing and ask why not?
I'm guessing you never drove one?
Brian |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim McMahon
Joined: 07 Apr 2007 Posts: 2787 Location: United States, St. Paul,
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Justin Martin wrote: | | Benn, while I agree with what you are saying on some of your points, if you run an ICC past its rev limiter to say 19k or 20K you will surely blow it up too. So how is that even close to a reasonable answer? |
For the sake of clarity, KZ's dont have a rev limiter. They just stop revving at a certain point without a load and you can keep them around that point without issue. You can also overrev them beyond that with a downshift without issue. In any case, from what I understand the rev issue has been taken care of with the Aixro.
There is more activity for the XR50 in Europe, but I'd hardly call it popular.
TJ and Ben echoed some of my concerns about how the paradigm shifts when you have a grid full of any motor package in a competitive situation. You can probably play with a stock moto for 50hrs between rebuilds (rather you than me mind you!) but when you turn the wick up its a different game. Same with Rotax...
But, maybe it would hold up when raced hard. The XR50 is too powerful for its own good I would say though.
Don't get me wrong, I'd love one and I'd like to see it succeed I'm just dubious about the maintenance\rebuild claims. I maintain an aixro with a CVT would be an insanely great package. _________________ CES Grattan pre-entry is open. TaG, Shifter, KPV, KT100, Animal\LO206, enduro or superkart.
Click Here to enter Grattan online
Last edited by Jim McMahon on Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:46 am, edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Go Top
|