EKN Platinum Forum - Russell
SoCal Sprinters
HOME - NEWS - FEATURES - DRIVERS - PR WIRE - FORUMS - MULTIMEDIA - PHOTOS - SCHEDULES - RESULTS - LINKS - INTERNATIONAL NEWS - NEW TO KARTING - CONTACT

K1 Speed - SS


Go Racing Magazine - Button


Extreme Karting


SCCA Enterprises


Pure Karting - DB


Kart-o-Rama - Button


Allen Berg Racing Schools

Leading Edge Motorsports
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Login to check your private messagesLogin to check your private messages   LoginLogin 
Nissan Delta Wing your thoughts?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    eKartingNews.com Forum Index -> Non-Karting Motorsports Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Justin Martin



Joined: 27 Mar 2012
Posts: 328

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 8:29 am    Post subject: Nissan Delta Wing your thoughts? Reply with quote

Personally as innovative as it may be I feel the the advantages lost in downforce adjustment, suspension, and front tire contact patch.... Too many compromises IMO.

What are your thoughts?


Last edited by Justin Martin on Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:45 am, edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Peter Zambos



Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 540
Location: United States, Illinois, near Chicago

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I heartily and respectfully disagree. I would absolutely love to race this thing.

This isn't a typically car that, because of the limits of mechanical grip due to high vehicle weight, must rely heavily (no pun intended) upon downforce to get it through the turns. As it is so light, the only downforce requirements are to keep the vehicle vertically stable, to counter the thing from becoming too light from lift at high speed. You then really don't have to worry about generating more downforce for a specific application and therefore don't need to worry about adjusting it to a significant degree.

Contact patch is relative. If your grip is ample, you'd say that the contact patch is appropriate, wouldn't you? Well, the Delta Wing doesn't lack front grip. So, even though the front tires look like they could go on my bicycle, they get the job done.

I can't speak to the suspension. I race a kart, after all.

Listen, I thought the thing was ridiculous at first and even as late as last February when the mock-up was at the Chicago Auto Show. It's proven me wrong, and it was as fast as an LMP2 with the same motor that powers a Nissan Juke (btw, Nissan, not Mazda), and Bowlby says that there's a lot left to develop. To boot, it was designed in the States (admittedly by an Englishman), developed it the States and built in the States.

I love it and want one. I think it even might fit in my trailer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TJ Koyen



Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 1425

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I also have grown to love it. I hated it as a concept for the new IndyCar, but as a prototype road racer, it's awesome. And it's proven to be pretty damn quick.
_________________
T.J. Koyen
OKTANE VISUAL - Custom Helmet Paint & Graphic Design

www.oktanevisual.com
www.facebook.com/oktanevisual
--------------------------
DB Motorsports
Exprit/Leopard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Chris Hurst



Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 570
Location: United States, California,

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Delta Wing really caught my eye when I first saw it. I think it's in line with an alternative way of thinking that doesn't get put into practice as much as it should be due to regulations and it's a shame.

Reminds me of some of Luigi Colani's designs if anyone is unfamiliar with him if you read his books you will look at the best looking modern race cars and think they look boring. Some of this work:


30% better fuel consumption without even touching the motor.


Ferrari told him he didn't know how to build cars so he took an F50 I think that was and redesigned it. I think to date it is actually the highest top speed Ferrari in the world.

[img]http://thinng.com/system/images/3458/large/luigi-colani-aerodynamic-race-cars3.png?1317806401[/img]
Shooting for 300mph with this car in the future according to Colani.

He has a lot of other cars and a great book of auto / industrial design. When I saw the Delta it reminded me of a Colani car for Le Mans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Justin Martin



Joined: 27 Mar 2012
Posts: 328

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Guys, I guess I didn't quite make my opinion clear. It's not so much the aerodynamic properties I am against, nor am I against the lighter weight or smaller engine. I am against the design of the front end.

From an aeronautical engineering standpoint one can achieve the same aerodynamic advantages without sacrificing such things like a wider front end.(I am in my Sr year of aerospace engineering, and I am not blowing hot air....)

I have countless hours toying with aerodynamic properties and there is no advantage in that front end over a wider conventional front end. You can achieve the same drag coefficient with many different shapes. Frontal surface area, or pressure has less to do with aerodynamic force than the air you leave behind you.

I am all for a lighter less powerful, more aerodynamic car. However I believe it can be achieved with a conventional much wider front end.

After all, aren't you guys of all people aware of how front end adjustments can effect a car/kart?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jeff grose



Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Posts: 1249
Location: United States, Florida, cocoa

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

so much for the D-Wing, crashed out @ Petit Lemans today
_________________
jlgracing
#31 Gillard/PDBAmerica
IAME Leopards by P1 Engines
Tag Sr./FKCS/WKA
Driver: Jesse Grose
Remember: "No matter where you go,there you are"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris Hurst



Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 570
Location: United States, California,

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin Martin wrote:
Guys, I guess I didn't quite make my opinion clear. It's not so much the aerodynamic properties I am against, nor am I against the lighter weight or smaller engine. I am against the design of the front end.

From an aeronautical engineering standpoint one can achieve the same aerodynamic advantages without sacrificing such things like a wider front end.(I am in my Sr year of aerospace engineering, and I am not blowing hot air....)

I have countless hours toying with aerodynamic properties and there is no advantage in that front end over a wider conventional front end. You can achieve the same drag coefficient with many different shapes. Frontal surface area, or pressure has less to do with aerodynamic force than the air you leave behind you.

I am all for a lighter less powerful, more aerodynamic car. However I believe it can be achieved with a conventional much wider front end.

After all, aren't you guys of all people aware of how front end adjustments can effect a car/kart?


Thats an interesting observation. Would be interesting to ask one of your teachers that question. I'd be really interested to see what someone with a Ph.D or a lot of experience in the subject matter would say.

Maybe they made the front end smaller to help with maneuvering around the field or track? I don't think they would do it unless there was a reason behind it.

Can anyone offer some insight?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Peter Zambos



Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 540
Location: United States, Illinois, near Chicago

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin Martin wrote:
After all, aren't you guys of all people aware of how front end adjustments can effect a car/kart?


I'm sure there's one or two of us around here that might have an idea. Remember, though, there are a lot of reasons for why the front end of a kart has to be as wide as it is that may not pertain to a car, especially if the position and width from vehicle centerline are not determined by the technical regulations, as a car doesn't have that pesky solid rear axle that we do. As long as your center of gravity's height isn't overpowering the narrow track, which is why many cars have the front track width they do, why make it wider than it has to be?

You can then start with a clean canvas, and if your design doesn't require a more tradition front track width, then why do it? Justin, perhaps you can steer my thoughts as my background doesn't include your education, but I would think that if you can get away with the narrow front end, the vehicle can potentially have lower drag at the font, allowing the opportunity to find a gentler path for the air to flow around the vehicle similar to how the F-16 jet widens after the cockpit section.

Ultimately, is it just the aesthetics that you don't like, Justin?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Peter Zambos



Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 540
Location: United States, Illinois, near Chicago

PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jeff grose wrote:
so much for the D-Wing, crashed out @ Petit Lemans today


Saw that, too.
http://www.deltawingracing.com/news/2012/10/17/gunnar-jeannette-talks-about-road-atlanta-crash.html
Looks like they'll get it up and running again in time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jeff grose



Joined: 11 Dec 2008
Posts: 1249
Location: United States, Florida, cocoa

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 3:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

quite a discussion of who was at fault on the wreck Shocked
_________________
jlgracing
#31 Gillard/PDBAmerica
IAME Leopards by P1 Engines
Tag Sr./FKCS/WKA
Driver: Jesse Grose
Remember: "No matter where you go,there you are"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris Livengood



Joined: 24 Jul 2001
Posts: 2432
Location: United States, Pennsylvania, Da Burgh

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's an interesting experiment that's for sure. It has done a nice job of presenting some design ideas and it has even won over some praise, probably more so than it deserves in some cases but less in other areas.

The ACO screwed them when they didn't let them run their differential, otherwise it could have been cooler yet.

Bottom line is that it is a cool idea, it will inspire children to dream about racecars again, and it might even provide good science for future ideas. It however is not the answer for the racecar of tomorrow. The law of physics haven't changed.
_________________
http://www.Chrislivengood.net
http://www.Work-Racing.com
http://www.OurZeal.com
http://www.Karting101.com
"Auto racing, helping white guys get laid since 1887!!!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Chris Hurst



Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 570
Location: United States, California,

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not sure if any of you guys have seen this article, but I'm sure it will be interesting to some:

What Can-Am would be today if there were no restrictions....
http://www.caranddriver.com/features/what-can-am-could-have-been

Even if the Delta Wing crashes and burns (metaphorically of course) at least they are out doing something different and trying new things. If I turn 80 some day and racing cars still look the same I'll be severely disappointed.

On the whole though when you look at the shapes of automobile in terms of overall shape they really haven't been altered much in the last 60 years. What surprises me most with the Delta Wing is that given they are going for efficiency and light weight over brute force and horsepower they have chose to keep it an open cockpit style race car.

You would think they would enclose it for aero purposes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scott Heavin



Joined: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 1766
Location: United States, Indiana, New Castle

PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I took this at the Ganassi shop a few months ago...


_________________
Spec TaG Masters @ NCMP / #23
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gregory Dzielinski



Joined: 12 Oct 2005
Posts: 223
Location: United States, New Jersey, Ramsey

PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Delta Wing crashed heavly yesterday at RA
_________________
The wheel is turning and you can't slow down,
You can't let go and you can't hold on,
You can't go back and you can't stand still,
If the thunder don't get you then the lightning will.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chris Hurst



Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 570
Location: United States, California,

PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scott Heavin wrote:
I took this at the Ganassi shop a few months ago...



That thing looks amazing in silver and it really is something else to look at. Reminds me of an SR-71 in that photo. Nice! I don't care what anyone says I still think this car is really unique and I would love to drive one. Would anyone pass that opportunity up ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    eKartingNews.com Forum Index -> Non-Karting Motorsports Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Go Top
Copyright © 2002 - 2013 Ekartingnews.com. All Rights Reserved.       Maintained by Holbi LLP
DB time: 0.139509 (21.78%), total time:0.640674, queries:38