| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Steve Ekstrand
Joined: 15 Dec 2008 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spray paint and chromed valve covers are comfort and convenience allowances in solo.
But in the adjacent thread I commented about the air cleaners. People said they were removing the green air filter on the WF. My understanding is that that particular green filter is the only filter allowed on a world formula and must be unmodified (outer ware pre-filter bag is optional). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brian Regganie
Joined: 29 Feb 2012 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eric,
I see the point you’re trying to make. In several conversations I’ve had over the years with both members of the KAC and SCCA Solo Tech Department, I have been told that the motors are to be WKA/IKF legal in terms of how the engines are built. Apparently they do not consider the starter to be part of the “engine” as they have always said that the starter must remain as installed. Since the motor is allowed in other sanctioning bodies to be run without the starter, I agree that in 2013 hopefully the rulebook will state whether the starter is still to be installed or not. As for now, what you were told a week ago by the KAC is consistent with what I have been told. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eric Nelson
Joined: 22 May 2003 Posts: 175 Location: United States, California, Pasadena
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Brian,
A heartfelt "Thank You." Honestly my intent was to solve a problem, not create another one.
See you guys in Lincoln! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andrew Peppler
Joined: 08 Aug 2010 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wait, I thought the push to WF's was for the ability to start by themselves? What am I missing that you wouldn't want a starter for autocross (I can understand sprint racing). I was thinking of changing over to WF so he could start himself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brian Regganie
Joined: 29 Feb 2012 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Even if there was an allowance one day to remove the starter, you could always choose to keep it. The big advantage of having a four stroke is they rarely if ever stall. Knock on wood, we have been running four strokes for 5 years and have yet to have one stall on course. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eric Nelson
Joined: 22 May 2003 Posts: 175 Location: United States, California, Pasadena
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I would agree. I think 4-Cycle kart engines are for the most part designed to produce power relatively close to their idle speed, with low clutch lockup speed and huge flywheels to keep them running. In my experience, if a 4-cycle motor idles OK on grid, it generally will not stall even during a huge spin. But with the can KT, for instance, peak power is many thousands of RPM above idle speed, the clutch might be set at 8000+ RPM. So slam on the brakes and drop RPM even for a second, motor stalls and clutch disengages, no real flywheel to keep it running, Game Over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andrew Peppler
Joined: 08 Aug 2010 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| But having a starter and battery is bad because of what? Is it weight? I have a lightweight driver so that wouldn't really be an issue in our case. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eric Nelson
Joined: 22 May 2003 Posts: 175 Location: United States, California, Pasadena
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't think there's a mechanical disadvantage aside from the obvious lopsided addition of weight. The realistic disadvantage is that since 2006, IKF & WKA have allowed removing of the starter, and I would say 80% of the engines being club raced (at least out here in CA) no longer have the starters with them. Many of the starters have been thrown away. So requiring the starter (or any other significant deviation from IKF / WKA rules) greatly limits the supply of available used engines. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom Reynolds
Joined: 08 Jul 2008 Posts: 555 Location: United States, New Mexico, Albuquerque
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| FWIW I have always perceived the WF to require a starter as the rules have sat for the years. I agree its ambiguous the way its written and I believe this may be clarified next year. It is nice to see it discussed and resolved before nationals. I cannot stress no one involved should tolerate little leaguing, bickering, etc in front of the kids. If you have a problem, come see me and I'll get the other party involved and we'll resolve this away from the kids. Last year wasn't a good year for this but we all learned something about this and I'm confident we all have the kid's best interest at heart. Otherwise, I'll be filing the paperwork myself on the parent, or person representing the parent's party. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Karl Hughes
Joined: 15 Aug 2011 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Andrew Peppler wrote: | | But having a starter and battery is bad because of what? Is it weight? I have a lightweight driver so that wouldn't really be an issue in our case. |
Andrew, one of the reasons we switched to WF is to get the onboard start capability. Having a bunch of seat time in a TaG kart, I love being able to push that button.
The kart I picked up was an ex-road race kart that had been brought over to autocross and run in FJA. It did not have the starter, but I was able to pick one up through this forum. I have yet to chase down and install the wiring, button and battery, but we're closer to the goal.
The WF is a vast improvement over the tired old Raptor we replaced. Easier to start, better behaved when running. The JB throttle-limiting kit was simple to install, and my son likes the newer chassis way better than the antique he was driving.
We have to add so much lead that the starter weight is a non-issue. I will install the battery on the opposite side of the kart to help balance the weight (as far as I know there is no restriction on where the battery is mounted.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joe Ricard
Joined: 23 Jun 2009 Posts: 882 Location: United States, Mississippi,
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Man I loved the Raptors because:
When you finally got the thing started and the yo yo did not hit you in the wrist, nose or ear it was pretty damn rewarding.
If it fired on the 1st pull from cold it was a good day.
Then it just idled and sounded so damn cool.
Oh and there were no printed rules ever published for SCCA SOLO to build them to.  _________________ Arrow AX-8/ Rotax Sr. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eric Nelson
Joined: 22 May 2003 Posts: 175 Location: United States, California, Pasadena
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tom,
That would be a welcome improvement from last year. As I remember, the "bickering" started when the youth steward on duty said he was going to take the kids, sit them down in a room away from the parents, and have them discuss the potential of a mechanical protest. I think that came across as being absurd to essentially everybody who saw it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alan Sheidler
Joined: 09 Aug 2001 Posts: 473
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Eric Nelson wrote: | Tom,
That would be a welcome improvement from last year. As I remember, the "bickering" started when the youth steward on duty said he was going to take the kids, sit them down in a room away from the parents, and have them discuss the potential of a mechanical protest. I think that came across as being absurd to essentially everybody who saw it. |
Remember better. The sniping and sneaky accusations started days earlier among the parents, and included a person with no children at the event. It was a shameful display of "little league syndrome". Personally, I think the kids would have come to a fair conclusion, and the concept of the DRIVERS having to answer for the pettiness of their parents was a brilliant idea. It certainly stopped all talk of a protest in the FJ classes.
2011 Nationals was a prime example of why there is still strong sentiment to delete the FJ classes from the National Championships. Many attendees saw parents and others behaving very badly, in a way that would have gotten them a reprimand or at least some poor sportsmanship penalty in any other class.
It had better not happen this year. Some people should wake up and realize how thin the ice is that they are skating on.... FJ classes are not "locked" into being a continuously available thing at the Nationals.
Last edited by Alan Sheidler on Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Larry MacLeod
Joined: 28 Sep 2005 Posts: 299 Location: United States, Michigan, Ypsilanti
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Alan Sheidler wrote: | Remember better. The sniping and sneaky accusations started days earlier among the parents, and included a person with no children at the event.....
.....It had better not happen this year. Some people should wake up and realize how thin the ice is that they are skating on.... FJ classes are not "locked" into being a continuously available thing at the Nationals. |
I agree. Not a lot of people are in favor of FJ at Nationals. It could be gone tomorrow if things don't go well this year.
In fact, I'd like to see those people without kids barred from the Jr grid and Jr impound, especially those individuals with a history of making trouble for FJ at Nationals.
Larry _________________ F125 #196
Old Birel/ hodgepodge Honda CR125
Lefty Funk
Detroit Region |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eric Nelson
Joined: 22 May 2003 Posts: 175 Location: United States, California, Pasadena
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| LOL Good luck with that |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|